Independent comparisonAll prices in AUD

Zeller vs Square: AU Rates and Verdict (2026)

Zeller vs Square, compared on the in-person and online rates you actually pay, plus least-cost routing and hardware, with no lock-in either way.

Independent comparison by MerchantCompare. Prices last checked . How we compare

Zeller logo

Zeller at a glance

Zeller is usually cheaper in person at a flat 1.4%, including on Amex, adds least-cost routing on debit, and bundles a free business account and card. It suits hospitality and retail that take most payments at the counter and want a single Australian provider for banking and payments.

Square logo

Square at a glance

Square wins on its all in one ecosystem and the cheapest entry reader. It is the easier pick if you also sell online or want POS, invoicing and a store in one place, even at a slightly higher in person rate of 1.6% and without least-cost routing.

70%30%
In-personOnline
2 ProvidersZeller logoZellerSquare logoSquare
Est. Cost /mo (AUD)$246/moCheapest$267/mo
Ratings
4.0Trustpilot (264)4.6Capterra (3,031)
Rates & fees
Best1.4%1.6%
Best1.7% + $0.252.2%
FreeFree
FreeFree
FreeFree
Best1.4%1.6%
0%0%
FreeFree
FreeFree
Unified commerce
Online capabilities
Hardware
From $99Best$65
Platform & trust
No lock-inNo lock-in
Next business dayNext day
NoneNone
Standard payouts1.5%
AI
Estimates based on $15,000/mo volume. Rates can change without notice, confirm current pricing with the provider before signing on.
How we calculate this
  • Estimated cost: each provider’s published prices and rates applied to the inputs you set above (such as volume, team size, or invoices), plus any fixed monthly fees.
  • Providers with an incomplete cost (shown as “+ processing” or “+ payroll”) and quote-only providers are never ranked as the cheapest while a complete-cost option exists.
  • These are estimates. Published rates can change and your final pricing depends on your business, so confirm current pricing with the provider before switching.

Zeller and Square are the two names most Australian small businesses weigh up when they want simple card payments without a bank contract. Both are pay as you go, both skip monthly fees and lock-ins, and both ship hardware you can be trading on the same day. The difference comes down to the rate you pay, whether you can route debit taps to a cheaper network, and how much else you want the provider to do. Plans and pricing checked July 2026, and every figure below is pulled live from our pricing database.

Pricing and rates compared

Zeller's headline is a flat 1.4% in person, including on American Express at the same 1.4%, which undercuts Square's 1.6%. On a typical month of card takings that gap puts money back in your pocket before you count anything else, so a cafe or shop that takes most payments at the counter will usually pay less with Zeller. The calculator above turns that rate gap into a dollar figure for your own volume.

Online flips the comparison into a maths problem. Zeller charges 1.7% + $0.25 per transaction, while Square charges a flat 2.2%. There is a break even order value: above it Zeller is cheaper, below it Square's no fixed fee structure wins because the fixed 25 cent component hurts small baskets. The two providers cost the same at an order value of about $50, where Zeller's 0.5% rate saving exactly offsets its 25 cent fee. Above $50 Zeller pulls ahead, below it Square does. The calculator above lets you set your in person and online split and your average transaction so you can see which way your own numbers fall. Both providers refund chargebacks for free, so that is not a deciding factor between them.

What the rate gap means in dollars

Take a cafe putting $20,000 a month through the terminal. At Square's 1.6% that is $320 a month in card fees. At Zeller's 1.4% it is $280, a saving of $40 every month, or about $480 a year, for exactly the same transactions. The gap scales linearly: at $50,000 a month the difference is $100 a month, and at $10,000 it is $20. Least-cost routing on Zeller's debit taps, covered below, can widen that gap further.

Online, the maths depends on basket size. Zeller's rate plus fixed fee beats Square's flat rate once the order value clears about $50, so the percentage saving outweighs the fixed fee. A store full of small orders leans Square online; larger average orders lean Zeller. The calculator above does this arithmetic for your own volume and split, using the current rates from our database.

Least-cost routing: a Zeller-only cost lever

One difference the headline rates hide is least-cost routing. When a customer taps a debit card, the payment can travel over the international Visa or Mastercard network or over Australia's own eftpos network, and eftpos is usually the cheaper of the two for the merchant. Zeller supports least-cost routing and sends eligible contactless debit taps down the cheapest available network automatically. Square does not give merchants that routing control in Australia.

For a business where a large share of takings are debit tap and go, which covers most cafes, bakeries, convenience stores and grocers, that routing can pull Zeller's effective rate below its 1.4% headline on those transactions, a saving Square cannot match at any volume. If your customers mostly tap debit cards rather than credit, this alone can decide the choice. If they mostly pay by credit card, or a phone wallet loaded with a credit card, routing has less to work with and the headline rates matter more.

Who each one is built for

Zeller is the Australian all rounder. Alongside the terminal you get a free business transaction account and card, so it doubles as light banking, which appeals to owners who want their takings, account and card in one place at the lowest counter rate. Our full Zeller review breaks down the account and hardware in detail.

Square is the ecosystem play. The same account runs a free online store, invoicing, payment links, appointments and a full POS, so a business that sells across a counter and online, or wants one system for everything, gets more from Square even at the slightly higher in person rate.

Which fits a cafe, a retail shop, or a market stall

For a cafe or restaurant, Zeller's flat 1.4% on every card including Amex usually wins, because hospitality takes nearly everything at the counter, Amex acceptance without a rate penalty matters to diners, and least-cost routing quietly trims the debit taps. For a retail shop that also sells online, Square's combination of free online store, inventory and POS often justifies the premium over Zeller's counter rate. For a market stall or mobile business starting out, Square's cheap entry reader is the lowest-risk first step, and you can switch later because neither provider locks you in. You can also weigh both against every option in our full Australian payment provider comparison, and our POS system comparison covers the till side of that decision.

Hardware and terminals

Zeller's terminal is a full standalone device with its own screen and receipt options, and it costs current pricing. It works on its own, with no phone or tablet required. Square's tap to pay reader is the cheapest way in at current pricing, but it pairs to a phone or tablet running the Square app rather than standing alone. That is the trade off: Square is cheaper to start, while Zeller feels more like a dedicated till out of the box and needs no second device. Square also sells its own standalone Terminal and Register hardware higher up the range if you outgrow the reader. Both offer local Australian support, and neither charges a setup fee or a PCI compliance fee.

Australian support and settlement

Both are built for Australia and settle to an Australian bank account, with next business day settlement as standard. Zeller settles into its own bundled business account, which is part of why it appeals to owners wanting banking and payments together. Both provide local support, and neither ties you to a fixed term, so switching later is low risk. Settlement timing and support quality are close enough that they rarely decide the choice on their own.

Switching and getting started

Because there is no contract either way, moving is simple: order the hardware, create the account, and start taking payments, usually within a day. If you are leaving a bank terminal, keep it active for a short overlap so you are never without a way to take cards, then return it once your new device is settling reliably.

Pros and cons for this matchup

Zeller wins on the in person rate at 1.4%, Amex parity at the same rate, least-cost routing on debit, and the bundled business account, but starts dearer on hardware. Square wins on the cheapest entry reader and a far deeper online and POS ecosystem, but its 1.6% in person and flat 2.2% online cost more for counter heavy, larger ticket businesses, and it has no least-cost routing.

The verdict

If you take most payments at the counter and want the lowest rate, least-cost routing on debit, and a built in business account, Zeller is the pick. If you sell online as well as in person, or you want one provider for your store, invoices and POS, Square's ecosystem makes it the better all rounder despite the slightly higher in person rate. Set your real split and average transaction in the calculator above to confirm which is cheaper for you.

Ratings

Zeller logoZeller
Square logoSquare
User rating
4.0/ 5 on Trustpilot (264)
4.6/ 5 on Capterra (3,031)
What stands outLowest in person rate, Amex parity at 1.4%, least-cost routing, bundled business account.Cheapest entry reader, deep online and POS ecosystem.

The user rating is the average from verified reviews on the named external source.

Frequently asked questions

Is Zeller or Square cheaper?

In person, Zeller is cheaper at a flat 1.4% against Square's 1.6%. Online, Zeller charges 1.7% plus a small fixed fee per transaction while Square charges a flat 2.2%, so Zeller wins on larger online orders and Square can win on small ones where the fixed fee bites. Zeller also runs least-cost routing on debit taps, which Square does not, so for debit-heavy businesses Zeller's real-world rate is lower still. Neither has monthly fees or lock-in contracts. The comparison table above shows the current rates and fees in Australian dollars.

Do Zeller and Square charge monthly fees?

No. Both are pay as you go with no monthly fee, no setup fee and no lock-in contract. You only pay the per transaction rate plus the one off cost of the card reader or terminal.

Does Zeller or Square support least-cost routing?

Zeller supports least-cost routing, which automatically sends contactless debit taps down the cheapest available network (usually eftpos rather than Visa or Mastercard) to lower the fee on those transactions. Square does not offer merchant-controlled least-cost routing in Australia. For a business where a large share of payments are debit tap and go, Zeller's routing can pull the effective rate below its 1.4% headline, a saving Square cannot match.

What does the hardware cost?

Square's tap to pay reader is the cheapest way in, but it pairs to a phone or tablet. Zeller's terminal is a full standalone device with a screen that works without a phone. See the comparison table above for the current hardware costs in Australian dollars.

Which is better for taking payments online?

Zeller handles online payments at 1.7% plus a small fixed fee per transaction, which is cheaper than Square on larger orders. Square has the deeper online toolkit though, with a free online store, payment links and invoicing built in. If online is a core channel, Square's ecosystem is usually the smoother fit.

How do I switch from Square to Zeller (or the other way)?

There is no exit fee or contract with either provider, so switching is just ordering the other terminal and creating an account, usually live within a day or two. Keep the old device active for a short overlap so you can always take cards, then close the unused account. Your transaction history stays exportable from the old dashboard.

Is Zeller or Square better for a cafe?

Usually Zeller, because a cafe takes almost everything in person and Zeller's flat 1.4% beats Square's 1.6%, including on Amex, with least-cost routing trimming debit taps further. On $20,000 a month of card takings the rate gap alone is about $40 a month saved. Square makes more sense if the cafe also runs online ordering through Square's ecosystem.

Is Zeller or Square better for a retail shop?

For a retail shop that takes payments only at the counter, Zeller is usually cheaper thanks to its flat 1.4% rate and least-cost routing on debit. If the shop also sells online, or wants built in inventory, a free online store and an integrated POS, Square's ecosystem often justifies its 1.6% in person rate. The comparison table above shows the current rates and hardware costs in Australian dollars.

How does MerchantCompare compare Zeller and Square?

We are independent and not owned by any provider. The comparison table above pulls live pricing from our database, last checked 16 July 2026, and the calculator estimates each option at your own numbers. Our editorial verdict weighs price, features and Australian fit, not commercial relationships. See How we compare for our full method.

Keep comparing

Related comparisons

Browse all versus comparisons